Pastor's pitch takes promise too far
To me, the "Jesus Heals Cancer" sign complaint appears to be about morals rather than anti-religion or anti-freedom of speech.
In trying to give a message of hope, the church has chosen to use the word cancer which, unfortunately for thousands of people around the world, brings agonising visions and feelings of suffering and loss.
As a Christian myself, I am surprised at the pastor's lack of compassion and empathy towards the family who feel upset (and I am sure they are not the only ones who feel upset at this). Perhaps he would be willing to alter the words to "Jesus Heals" which could mean anything without focusing on the word cancer, and, therefore, not offending anyone specifically hurting from a cancer ordeal.
Does the pastor realise that Jesus himself would often ask that people not be told that he was doing any healing, because he wanted to be anonymous, and he wanted people to find out for themselves that he existed, and come to him in faith?
I believe that a church can function as a support group, but this statement has gone too far and appears to portray a promise rather than a message of hope.Louise PhilipTaradaleCouncil dreamersIt was with surprise that I read the Hastings paper information re: photo that the "Mayor" Lawrence Yule has an 'adviser'.