LIKE many around the world this week, I've been caught up in the story of a young woman sexually assaulted at Stanford University in the US.
A focus of the story, which has been going viral on social media, is that her attacker, a privileged white male, received only a six-month sentence and that his father appears to be excusing and minimising the crime.
The other angle that is getting a lot of social media attention is the disparity between sentences for similar crimes perpetrated by non-privileged African Americans.
At the same time, and for the first time in history, a woman is a serious candidate for the United States presidency.
Now you may well be wondering what this has to do with the museum and what on earth qualifies me to comment on such topics. Let me first say that I am making no comment on either Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign or indeed on the outcome of a trial. In both cases, I do not have enough information to have a valid opinion, I have not followed Clinton's politics and, I would have had to sit through the sexual assault trial to have a full picture of that situation.