As chairman of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC) I was interested to read my fellow Councillor Peter Beaven's Talking Point on Monday where he still seems confused about the realities of the Ruataniwha proposal.
While he supports the concept of water storage, he's not convinced the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme is the best option and continues to support an alternative proposal presented to a council committee recently by him and the three other Hastings councillors (Where it was dismissed in a 6-4 vote).
It was discussed in detail with an in-depth presentation from HBRC Chief Executive Liz Lambert on why the alternative would not work. This included the fact that for an irrigation scheme to be successful it needs a distribution network to get the water to the farms. The alternative suggests using the Tukituki River system to deliver the water. Unfortunately this is not possible as there can be no delivery of water down the river without a primary distribution network (headrace). The alternative also overlooked the opportunity to provide water under pressure to the farmgate which the Ruataniwha Scheme does. This will run all irrigation systems, saving farmers thousands in energy costs.
Ms Lambert's presentation is available on the 'Ruataniwha' page on the HBRC website, under 'Key documents'.
The alternative proposal also suggests the dam could be funded from HBRC's $80 million and a Government loan. As outlined by Mrs Lambert this can't happen. Crown Irrigation Investments will only invest once private sector capital has been exhausted and will not enter into a financial structure not involving the private sector.