A text to the editor last week caught the eagle eye of sub-editor Linda Hall.
It read: "Shocked to read an advert in the To Let column last week that read 'preferably Christians'! Is that morally right and what would the reaction be if the advert asked that only a certain race applied to rent the house?"
My reaction to it, politically correct or not, was fair enough - why waste everybody else's time? If Christians are the landlord's preference as tenants, then Christians is probably who they will choose. It just didn't strike me the same way as a reference to ethnicity or colour which would clearly be a breach of human rights legislation.
But it would appear that I am wrong. Ethical belief (lack of religious belief) is listed as a prohibited ground for discrimination. The exception is if the person concerned was seeking a flatmate, which they weren't in this case.
If seeking a flatmate one can apparently make references to age, colour, disability, employment status, ethical belief (lack of religious belief), ethnic or national origins, family status (having responsibility for children, being married to a particular person or being a relative of a particular person), marital status, political opinion (including having no political opinion), race, religious belief, gender and sexual orientation.