This forced the economist to question whether the Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC) is ensuring it will be the investors which take the shortfall.
"Or will the increased cost of construction plus assured investor returns ensure ratepayers suffer into the future with both increasing debt and reducing water quality?" he asked.
Mr Ridler said no irrigation scheme in the world had been built at original costings, "indeed most exceed them by over 80 per cent".
HBRC chairman Fenton Wilson said no more than $80 million of ratepayers' money would be invested in the scheme.
Mr Wilson said investors saw everything up front and the conversation between HBRIC and potential investors was ongoing.
Other issues raised by Mr Ridler included what he terms "the much quoted example of irrigation" Opuha.
"It ran out of irrigation water last season, despite releasing less water for river health than originally agreed," he said.
"Another dry summer is predicted and irrigation will likely cease again this season. A problem for non-average seasons and 'drought proofing' when full uptakes are achieved."
In terms of water reliability, he said Tonkin and Taylor produced figures for 17,200ha that provided less reliability than the Amuri scheme in North Canterbury.
"The RWSS has now extended the area to 25-30,000ha irrigated but the Makaroro River has not suddenly increased its flow," Mr Ridler said.
"HBRIC predict that in fact, future flows will decrease with global warming. This will not be an issue if farmer commonsense and correct on-farm analysis is applied, as far less than the 104 million cubic metres of water will ever be used."
Mr Wilson said the filling of the dam had been well documented. "The figures over the last 40-odd years show us that it will fill," he said.