Not to mentioning the oil data packages paid and supplied by National, the conferences and the wining and dining. Estimates of clear-cut lost revenue by tax breaks is in the hundreds of millions over the past few years, and the Greens plus other NGOs have estimated a clear-cut $46 million in tax breaks.
What is abundantly clear is that these perks have increased substantially since National came into office.
Subsidies take many shapes and sizes. There are many different mechanisms and incentives, and also clear favouritism.
But what is clear, more than anything else, is that we have a leadership whose sole drive is for more profit in the short term so that they look good, while being happy to leave a wasteland behind them that my generation will have to clean up. Why else would they be happy to set up coal mines in conservation land on the Denniston Plateau?
We need to stop fidgeting with numbers, allowing oil companies to funnel massive profits overseas and pay little in royalties in comparison to their gross profit. But that requires a change of government, and almost all of the literature agrees we need to act now if we want to stop the worst effects of climate change.
Nearly one third of our imports are fossil fuels. If we cut this, we could use the money spent to incentivise a modern green economy, ranging from video games to robotics. I'll leave it to your imagination to think of other emerging industries. Think of any sci-fi film really, and we're working on it.
Until the day comes when the Greens are in government and showing bold leadership in cutting our dependency on scarce and dangerous resources, it is up to us as a community to take action.
What is most frightening is the large-sale "block offer" that is soon to be on the coast of Hawke's Bay. When Tag Oil was here, the only reason it left was because of the transparency that community meetings gave the farmers who were prepared to sell their land for drilling.
It was collective action, communication and a sharing of values that rallied the community and forced Tag Oil to leave.
And now, the oil companies are back.
This is why I support the Hawke's Bay Regional Council in its decision to place a moratorium on oil and gas exploration. It cuts the head off the snake, and it is also good economic sense.
Royalties from oil and gas have dropped continuously since 2005, and there were very few companies who tendered for the recent block sale. We should invest in the productive sectors of our regions, not the dying ones.
Economically, the basic law of diminishing returns (we're putting in more and getting less) dictates we should abandon this industry.
Yet, we still have to fight for the shore. While Hawke Bay (not a typo, it's actually the name of the coastal land) is still in the Regional Council's legal parameters, I believe central government is running roughshod over local democracy.
And when this fails to pass legislation, Judith Collins sends personalised letters equating to bullying. They've also decreased the zoning of our moratorium, for this very reason.
In the Greens charter, we have the principle of responsible decision making. Continuing to invest and subsidising a failing, ecological destructive industry is not responsible. Penalising protesters explicitly for that industry is not responsible. Disregarding local democracy is not responsible.
The logical answer is to put our money towards a clean economy, and a productive economy. In Hawke's Bay, we have a thriving horticulture industry. Our organic produce is renowned and valuable.
We have great capacity for solar and marine energy with our beautiful weather - we should harness it.
Clean, green energy has the potential to create four times as many jobs as oil. This is where we should be putting our resources, and the Green party promises to do exactly that.
Damon Rusden is the Green Party candidate for the Napier seat in the upcoming general elections.
Views expressed here are the writer's opinion and not the newspaper's. Email: editor@hbtoday.co.nz
