There can be no doubt that the water debate is heating up. Concerns in Hawke's Bay about consents for water takes for export bottling plants are being matched in the South Island where the Ashburton District Council recently sold a property with attached water consents. The Ashburton community is expressing loud concerns.
This new commercial use for water - bottling it for export - has sparked a long-overdue debate on the prioritisation of water use, and who, if anyone, should be charged for it. So I believe this debate is needed and welcome it.
Throughout the country the debate is largely focusing on our inability to charge for water. My concern is more fundamental than this. I am concerned about the sustainability of our water resource - the Heretaunga acquifer. The response from the Hawke's Bay Regional Council to such concerns has been that the supply is adequate to meet current and future demands and that they have a good understanding of the science to support this. Being a "non-scientist" I don't have the expertise to argue with HBRC scientists and experts but I do know that our acquifer is a precious resource and that is behoves us to use the water wisely and with a long-term vision that will not disadvantage future generations.
It is therefore of concern for me to read an agenda item from last week's HBRC Regional Planning Committee meeting "Groundwater level changes in the Heretaunga and Ruataniwha Basin from 1994 to 2014". This report confirms the significance of our groundwater resource in the Hawke's Bay region. It is the second largest in the country and, to be fair to HBRC decision makers, it does not appear to be under the same level of pressure from water consents as the largest groundwater resource in Canterbury. This does not give us reason to be complacent.
The reason for my concern about the report and the current state of play with our acquifer is the apparent gap in HBRC knowledge. Do they in fact have the level of knowledge and science that they are claiming?