The issues associated with water in the Hawke's Bay region have been high profile recently because they highlight a national, and indeed international, struggle over access to water. This struggle includes the ownership of water, the sustainability of aquifers, the sale of bottled water and the expansion of large irrigation schemes to increase the intensification of agriculture and horticulture. All of this is taking place in a context of degraded water quality and the disturbing statistic that 60 per cent of our monitored rivers are too polluted for people to swim in.
The recent draft decision from a board of inquiry into the proposed Ruataniwha dam is part of this ongoing saga, over what is an acceptable level of pollution. The board of inquiry set a nitrate limit for 2030 to protect water quality, which farmers planning to increase production may not be able to meet by that date. However, Hawke's Bay Regional Council is continuing to promote the dam and seem to be burying their heads and ratepayers' money in the sand over this issue.
Hawke's Bay is also the site of a major debate over bottled water. If no one owns the water as the Government claims, then how is it possible for private companies to get access to aquifers that allow them to bottle and sell water overseas? The export of water from the Heretaunga aquifer is a slap in the face for desperate orchardists whose crops are suffering as a result of drought. The aquifer is the lifeblood of the area and its value was upheld recently in the Environment Court when Ngati Kahungunu won the point of principle that the aquifer's sustainability cannot be sacrificed in regional plans.
The water conflicts that are forcing many groups into the courtroom are being driven by the regional council's underlying ethos towards development and the investment arm pushing for the Ruataniwha dam. The first question in my mind is whether this is in fact the role of the regional council. Isn't the regional council mandated via the Resource Management Act to be the protector of water resources for the wider benefit of the region, not just the few?
Isn't it outrageous that private sector companies should be allowed to bottle and export water when locals need it and tangata whenua have a proprietorial interest that is being ignored? Isn't it a concern that between $12 million and $20 million of ratepayers' money has been spent promoting the Ruataniwha scheme, which possibly will benefit a group of landowners at the expense of water quality?