Accountancy is not my thing - my eyes glaze and my brain realises its days are numbered at the end of a financial year - but ever since an ex-brother-in-law attempted to explain the intricacies of double-entry bookkeeping, I've understood that figures can be manipulated to show any result desired.
And the bigger the organisation, the more number-crunchers kept busy deriving whatever the owners wish the year's events to reflect in their bottom line. Profits can be turned to losses, losses to profits; revising a handsome bit of Ebitda into a liability with a few write-downs and contingencies and the like while the cash gets stuffed into handy tax havens is excused as "legitimate" business.
Which is, basically, how the multinationals and ultra-wealthy avoid paying more than a token in taxes to anyone; the merry-go-round of backdoor transfers of nominal profits leaves nothing for the taxman to collect on. Judging by the fact there's an estimated $30-50 trillion salted away by the mega-rich within a veritable global maze of false-front companies, accountants are pretty good at cooking books.
But when it comes down to it, this sleight-of-pen is nothing more than legalised or quasi-legalised theft. It reinforces what a complete fiction money is, and what a fantasy playground the wealthy make of it at everyone else's expense.
A country " even a small one like New Zealand " is one of the larger types of entity playing this game. Of course there are some peculiarities " a country can levy taxes or other charges on anyone living and working in it, and has "social costs" to pay " but its accountants are just as adept at proving up is down or down is sideways, depending, as those of the corporations.