Seems to me the only people in the country unaware the whole asset-sale proposal is a dead duck are the 61 members of Parliament occupying the Government benches - and surely even they must now have doubts.
After all, of those SOEs proposed for sale one is technically bankrupt, one is mired in deleterious contractual negotiations, one is heavily targeted for Treaty of Waitangi claims, one is run by a woman who deserted the helm of a major company as it failed, and the last is run by a man who led the first one into its death dive.
A classic case of asset stripping, you might say; because their collective partial sale value (originally put at $5billion to 7billion) must now have reduced to fire-sale level, undermining the entire rationale (such as it was) of the exercise. Even the most unrepentant ideologue should have cause to pause over that.
Not that the Nats are admitting defeat quite yet - though interestingly the argument has switched from accentuating make-believe positives to blaming someone else for the negatives; a first step on the road to retreat.
Solid Energy's rapid fall from an inflated book value of $2.7billion to a pending bailout case (debts of $389million and counting) has much to do with hyperbole and little to do with industry nous or common sense.