Last week we heard news of the Supreme Court's ruling on the Ruataniwha land swap and indeed a ruling setting a precedent for all Forest Park conservation land in New Zealand that specially protected conservation land cannot be revoked and swapped for development purposes.
The immediate response from Prime Minister Bill English and Conservation Minister Maggie Barry was to devalue the Ruataniwha conservation area at stake.
They stated "Everyone thought the legislation meant that you could trade a lower conservation piece of land in return for higher conservation piece of land" and "for the past 30 years we all believed that the legislation allowed the swap of a low value piece of conservation land for a piece of land with higher conservation values".
The Supreme Court ruled that revocation of protected status can occur "only where its intrinsic conservation values no longer warrant such protection", and it was "clear" the protected status of the 22ha was appropriate.
So what are the conservation values of the 22ha of special protected land that played a part in the court's decision?