Like Lara Meyer, I would like to know how Peter Jones believes our region should address eroding land and keeping people employed.
There are a vast number of anti-pine critics out there who haven’t a clue of the scale of erosion or downstream ramifications that have the potential to permanently wipe out this region’s economic future.
Where did Peter Jones — not “we” as he claims — learn that pine trees weren’t an answer to erosion control?
For his information, and others with similar beliefs, if it weren’t for commercial forestry enticed here under various government schemes since 1961, the East Coast communities and our principal resource base would not be around today. It should also be recognised that a lot of people are working in forestry today.
Where did Mr Jones get the idea that eroding farmland could be farmed? If it wasn’t erosion, what initially triggered rural depopulation? The removal of Govt subsidies came later.