The report also placed the onus unduly on overseas forest owners, claiming that these companies had contributed to poor land use and the presence of woody debris.
“Many of New Zealand’s forests are investment partnerships — predominantly New Zealand shareholders and partners, not to say wholly New Zealand-owned companies and farm woodlots.
“All forestry companies harbour important community benefits, generating economic activity.
"These companies — whether NZ or foreign-owned — must also meet stringent criteria in order to operate.
“Both Huiarua and Matanui Stations mentioned in the report have been planted in a mix of native trees and pines as part of the owners’ corporate responsibility and to ensure integrated land use. Forestry activities in the Waiapu Valley have also seen the number of pupils at the local school triple.
“The report broaches the complexity of Tairāwhiti’s landscape and details the aftermath of Cyclone Gabrielle, but offers no real or specific solutions to land use problems or mitigating the effects of climate change.”
Forestry slash accounted for only 4 percent of the woody debris deposited in Hawke’s Bay — a figure omitted from the report. The remainder of that debris came from riparian plantings of willows, poplars and native trees, he said.
“Establishment of a Woody Debris Task Force is a good idea, however, given that forestry slash accounted for such a small proportion of the woody debris, the cost of the clean-up and composition of the taskforce should be inclusive of a wider group of parties — pastoral farming, for example, whose contribution to sedimentation is glossed over in the report.”