The Kermadec quake induced a new level of panic, and complicated the picture further. Here is a quake that is actually capable of generating a tsunami, but is 1500km away and therefore plenty of time to present an accurate risk assessment and evacuation plan.
The breathless coverage we saw and heard is far more likely to produce anxiety and fear that is disproportionate to the danger, and ultimately have people wondering if the little boy is crying wolf. Civil Defence should have a system in place to present all this information as effectively as GeoNet. How is it they apparently do not?
Of course, all earthquakes will have different responses but broad-brush understanding in the community appears to be limited and Civil Defence education should focus a lot more on understanding risk than evacuating for a real event, the part most people fully grasp.
“Long, strong, be gone” is useful in the absence of the internet, but GeoNet saying it's less than 8 is enough for me.
Donald Robson