“(b) Supporting business community and other initiatives which in the opinion of the Trustees are likely to encourage or sustain economic growth within the district that is or may be directly or indirectly for the benefit of the beneficiaries.
“5.2 No Trust purpose stated in this clause shall be deemed to have greater significance than any other such purpose.”
How does selling Eastland Network satisfy any of the above?
Preserving the capital? The purposes to which they intend re-investing, giving more money to EGL to play with, is a bad idea given their recent track record. Flick Energy — big losses; Geothermal power — unplanned extended outage; Helicopter investments — overspend.
Having regard for the cost to the majority of consumers who are connected to the company's electricity distribution system? Does selling do this? I think not.
Supporting businesses to encourage or sustain economic growth? A well-run network would do this. Forestry-focused port development, solar generation and wellbeing handouts all fall well short in my opinion.
As for the Trust wanting to spend their share on our “wellbeing”! Give us a break. We want our network, in our ownership, well maintained, and future-proofed for a climate changing E-World.
Colin Alder