Thankfully, after investigating the possibility that this might be another false alarm,
I began to realise what this seemingly throw-away line might mean - not only for the people of North Auckland but more importantly, for those provinces facing an uncertain future due almost entirely to the effects of climate change.
Provinces likely to be threatened by this emerging phenomenon are almost exclusively the rural provinces on the east coasts of both islands.
The key to survival for those regions will be their ability to build an infrastructure capable of maintaining productivity levels during the seasonal pressures associated with climate change. Not surprisingly, scientists are warning that the easterly position of those provinces makes them very vulnerable to more frequent severe droughts and cyclones that cause severe flooding and destruction to high-value crops and the high-quality land that supports those crops.
Those of us who have experienced and survived these more regular catastrophic events and the impacts they have on business operations, have consistently volunteered our recommendations for living with the changing environments - ironically, ideas that include the PM’s recipe for North Auckland’s own restructuring.
Unfortunately, up until now, local government in these rural communities have been held to ransom by the elitist, radical groups who have an inflated opinion of their own self worth and entitlement. As a result, very little progress has been made towards building defences against the full impact of climate change.
Local Councils have known for some time what needs to be done in mitigation, yet few have had the courage to challenge these unruly elements for fear of losing their own jobs or being accused of being racist, pale, stale males or the female equivalent.
But, due to the PM’s timely olive branch, I am hopeful that those who are intent on confronting the Government at Waitangi on Tuesday will have another think before endangering this fledgling evidence of trust that is essential in order to avoid further stalemate in areas where the consequences of inaction would be catastrophic.