Each year, they highlighted about 400 cases of poor management practices worldwide. About 58 of those were deemed to have nonconformity issues to a major level, but the New Zealand companies were at the most serious end of offending.
“The ones we found in New Zealand were severe enough to trigger some sanctioning straight away, which is not something we encounter that many times a year.
“We would probably encounter the situation from one to five times a year. And we will not be able to close those nonconformities until they demonstrate to us that not only they understood the issues well, but that they implemented in their systems any corrective actions and not only corrected in the short term, but also that their systems will prevent the audits having this type of issue in the future.”
ASI will not instruct the two auditing companies what changes to make to their systems because it needs to remain impartial, but it expects to see the nonconformities resolved withinin three months of the report being issued.
The companies can ask for an extension to complete the work.
Grunelle said because of the scale of the issues on the East Coast, ASI would come back later this year to check out other forest auditors around New Zealand.
“Just to make sure that the rest of New Zealand is OK and other conformities assistance bodies that were not assessed in New Zealand recently are also good. So we’re going to make sure everything is OK.”
International audits of New Zealand-based companies were part of a normal business routine, but ASI said it was increasing its reviews in response to the findings here.
As a result of the visits made late last year in February, Malaysian-owned Ernslaw One lost its internationally recognised Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification, which indicates trees were harvested in a responsible way.
On March 28, SGS suspended the FSC sustainability accreditation of a second East Coast forestry company, Aratu Forests. — RNZ