Peters moved on to much more controversial ground when he compared co-governance with the policies of Nazi Germany. New Zealand had gone backwards during the last government term when, without the handbrake of New Zealand First, race-based theories emerged, he said.
“Some people’s DNA made them, sadly, according to these people and condoned by their cultural fellow travellers, their DNA made them somehow better than others,” he said.
“I’ve seen this sort of philosophy before. I saw it in Nazi Germany. We all did. We’ve seen it elsewhere around the world with the horrors of history.”
It was a sweeping statement from Peters and one which many people will find extreme and alarming, coming from the man who is at present second in control of the country.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins accused Peters of using racism and anti-media rhetoric to divide the country — saying “Kiwis deserve better than a deputy prime minister who behaves like a drunk uncle at a wedding”.
Yesterday Peters clarified that the Nazi reference was specifically responding to comments by Te Pāti Māori members about Māori having a stronger genetic make-up.
Throughout his four-and-a-half-decade-long political career, Peters has had an ability to “read the room” and tailor his statements to meet the prevailing mood of his core support base. Could this be one of his missteps, or do his supporters accept and agree with his views?